Back to all projects
Workflow AutomationAI Automation

AI-Powered Ordering System for National Commercial Door Installer

Built a custom AI ordering workflow for one of the nation's largest commercial door installation companies. In this industry, a single typo on an order form means an entire custom door is manufactured wrong — costing thousands per mistake. Our system validates every specification against product databases, catches dimensional conflicts and formatting errors in real-time, and auto-populates order forms with verified data. Beyond ordering, the platform cross-references internal documentation and project files to flag inconsistencies before they hit the factory floor.

97%
reduction Order Errors
80%
faster Processing Time
$400K+
/year Cost Savings
order-validation-pipeline.pipeline
Order Validation Pipeline
step_01
Order Input
complete
step_02
Data Validation
complete
step_03
AI Cross-Check
complete
step_04
Spec Verification
complete
step_05
Factory Handoff
complete

The Challenge

What was breaking

A single typo on a door order form triggers a custom manufacturing run that can cost thousands of dollars to scrap and remake. The estimating team was catching most errors manually, but not fast enough and not consistently enough.

Single-digit errors cost thousands per door

A wrong fire rating, mis-entered width, or incompatible hardware prep meant the door got built wrong, shipped across the country, and scrapped — with full manufacturing cost absorbed.

Manual order processing was slow

Estimators were rekeying specifications across three disconnected systems — the internal ERP, the manufacturer portal, and project spec sheets — with no validation between them.

No systematic QA layer

Error catching depended on tribal knowledge from senior estimators. Newer hires missed edge cases and inconsistencies that only showed up after the door was already on the truck.

Specs drifted from the master project file

Orders were placed against outdated spec versions because nobody had time to cross-check every line item against architectural plans and project revisions.

Our Approach

How we solved it

We built an AI validation layer that sits between the order form and the manufacturer's ordering system. Every field gets checked against the live product database for valid configurations, dimensional tolerances are cross-referenced against fire and hardware compatibility rules, and the full order is compared against the project's master spec file to catch drift. Anything ambiguous routes to the estimator with a specific flag and a recommended fix — not a generic warning. The goal was never to replace the estimator; it was to make it impossible for a bad order to leave the building.

Architecture

How the system works

01

Order Input

Estimator submits order through the existing web form. No workflow change — the validation layer is invisible until something is wrong.

02

Data Validation

Every field is checked against the live product database API for valid configurations, dimensional tolerances, and allowed combinations.

03

AI Cross-Check

Claude evaluates the full order holistically — catching semantic conflicts (e.g., fire-rated door with non-rated hardware) that rule-based validators miss.

04

Spec Verification

Order is compared against the master project spec file. Drift from architect-approved dimensions or hardware callouts is flagged with the specific delta.

05

Factory Handoff

Clean orders push directly to the manufacturer system. Flagged orders route back to the estimator with context and a Slack notification.

The Impact

Before vs. after

Metric
Before
After
Order error rate
Multiple errors per week, caught downstream
97% reduction, most caught pre-submit
Time per order
25-40 minutes of manual entry
Under 8 minutes with auto-population
Spec validation
Eyeballed against PDF project files
Automated cross-check against master spec
Hardware/fire rating conflicts
Discovered at factory or install
Flagged at order entry with suggested fix
Annual scrap + rework cost
Six-figure budget line item
$400K+ reduction year over year

Outcomes

Beyond the headline numbers

97% reduction in order errors reaching the factory floor

80% faster order processing from entry to submission

$400K+ annual savings from eliminated scrap and rework

Senior estimator capacity reclaimed for bid work instead of QA

New hires productive in weeks instead of months — the system encodes the tribal knowledge

Factory-side complaints about bad orders dropped to near zero

Takeaways

What transferred

The real lever in AI workflow automation is not speed — it is error prevention at the point of entry. Every downstream system in a manufacturing pipeline amplifies mistakes, so a validation layer at the top of the funnel pays for itself many times over. This same pattern — AI as a contextual validator between a human input and a costly system of record — transfers cleanly to any industry where a small data error triggers an expensive physical or financial consequence.

Want results like these?

Every engagement starts with a conversation about your goals. No pitch deck — just a straightforward discussion about what's possible.

Start a Conversation