Working prototype

Preparing NDA reviews for counsel

A review workflow compares incoming agreements with a firm’s playbook and prepares issues for counsel.

Private investment

The workflow

REVIEW PLAYBOOKPreferred position
Purpose is defined
Assignment needs consent
Term is limited
Each mark links back here.
MUTUAL NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENTDraft for review

2. Purpose. The Receiving Party may use Confidential Information solely to evaluate the stated business purpose1.

5. Term. Confidentiality obligations remain in effect for perpetuity three years2.

7. Assignment. Neither party may assign this agreement without prior written consent3.

Source clause links retainedTracked-change draft
Illustrative workflow

Independent work, outside my role at Terakeet. Employment experience

The problem

Routine agreements compete for legal review time with documents containing unusual clauses. Terms that need attention can sit inside familiar language, leaving counsel to compare each agreement against the firm’s positions from the beginning.

A new relationship can wait in the same review queue as an agreement with terms that require negotiation. Counsel needs to see which clauses differ from the firm’s standard positions and where those clauses appear in the document.

What I built

The workflow reads an agreement against the firm’s playbook, links each flagged issue to its source clause, and prepares a tracked-changes draft. It supports counsel’s review by presenting a proposed position, while legal decisions remain with counsel.

  1. Compare with the playbook

    Check the agreement’s terms against the firm’s stated negotiation positions and required clauses.

  2. Triage with source links

    Group issues for review and link every flag to the clause that prompted it.

  3. Prepare a draft position

    Create a tracked-changes Word draft for counsel to accept, revise, or reject.

The outcome

Counsel gets source-linked flags, a triage recommendation, and a proposed redline to accept, adjust, or reject. The prototype prepares a starting position for review; it does not approve or sign agreements.

The review lanes distinguish agreements ready for routine review from those that need negotiation or escalation. When the firm’s standard positions change, the playbook can be updated directly so future comparisons reflect the revised guidance.

Business impact

Surfacing playbook exceptions and their source clauses gives counsel a prepared starting point, so review can focus on negotiation choices while legal judgment stays with counsel.

  • Issues linked to clauses
  • Prepared redline for review
  • Counsel retains legal judgment